Antwort auf: Ist Trezor wirklich die beste Option für einen Ledger-Überläufer?

Home Foren Trezor Wallet Ist Trezor wirklich die beste Option für einen Ledger-Überläufer? Antwort auf: Ist Trezor wirklich die beste Option für einen Ledger-Überläufer?

#2219155
brianddk
Gast
Up
0
Down
::

Few things to keep in mind.

The Wasabi (coinjoin) integration does not share private keys. Wasabi only looks at public keys, specifically UTXOs. What’s more, the feature uses TOR so there is no way for Wasabi, or their blacklist, to know your identity / IP / mac-address. And finally, the Wasabi feature has to mandatory opt-ins

1. Firmware opt-in – Before anyone can access CJ UTXOs, you have to accept a „Coinjoin [Y/N]“ prompt on the Trezor itself
2. Trezor Suite opt-in – Before Trezor Suite can access your CJ UTXOs, you have to accept the Wasabi black-listing policy in Suite

So if CJ really concerns you, just run the Bitcoin-Only firmware and use something like Sparrow or Electrum as your wallet (ie, NOT Suite).

Personally, I think Trezor, Coldcard, or Bitbox are all good choices. I like Trezor because it supports a fair amount of coins, and I know the source code better than Coldcard or Bitbox.

### Update

I requested Trezor provide a slimed down version of Suite without interactions to zkSNACKs and +invity for customers that share your concerns.

https://github.com/trezor/trezor-suite/issues/8524