Trezor zeichnet sich dadurch aus, dass er kritische Kommentare entfernt, anstatt neue Münzen hinzuzufügen.

[root_s2yse8vt]

Up

0

Down

::

Disclaimer: Ich bin nicht mit Ledger oder sonstigem verbunden. Außerdem möchte ich eine Hardware-Wallet kaufen und habe viel im Internet zu diesem Thema recherchiert. Ich mag Trezor für Open Source, Web-Wallet-App (ohne die Notwendigkeit, Desktop / Mobile Apps zu installieren).

Ok, zurück zum Thema.

Es gab einige meiner Kommentare zum langsamen Modus von Trezor und zur Einstellung gegenüber der Community.

https://preview.redd.it/xz4fedv6jpb81.png?width=1474&format=png&auto=webp&s=11d8bbd1927e9c4315132c1e9874fc6d2826b350

Mein erster Kommentar war: „Hallo 2021, keine Unterstützung für Solana. Die Antwort ist Ledger!“

Der zweite war „Trezor ist gut darin, Kommentare zu entfernen, anstatt neue Münzen hinzuzufügen.“

Zunächst einmal sollte sich Trezor bei der Community dafür bedanken, dass sie Features/Münzen für sie hinzufügen. Aus irgendeinem Grund wollen die Mitarbeiter von Trezor keine Pull Requests integrieren, die bereits von der Community erstellt wurden und wichtige Dinge wie die Integration von Solana beinhalten.

Zweitens, Kritik einfach zu entfernen, sieht nach einer schwachen Position aus.

Drittens, wenn man Open Source ist, dann sollte man diesen Weg bis zum Ende gehen, offen für die Leute sein und auf die Community hören!

Viertens: Wo ist ein klarer Fahrplan?

[SilverTruth7809]

Up

0

Down

::

I dont see a problem, both of your comments where pretty useless imo.

[GSYNC3R]

Up

0

Down

::

Dude, you’re an idiot. GitHub is NOT the platform for that kind of behaviour. You are an absolute fool. They did nothing wrong here

[CursedFeanor]

Up

0

Down

::

Promoting the competition on their platform… You shouldn’t be surprised.

[oGe2z]

Up

0

Down

::

Shitcoiners deserve Ledger.

[brianddk]

Up

0

Down

::

As you clearly mention… Trezor doesn’t add coins, the community does. Trezor simply approves or denies the PR. So if you want to know their criteria, best to read the published documentation rather than rage-quitting on their non-technical public board

> Our current product goal is to unite what we support in firmware and in Trezor Suite and since firmware is way ahead of Suite we want to pause for a bit, implement the remaining coins into Suite and then consider adding new coins. **This effectively means that our team will not be accepting any requests to add new cryptocurrencies**.

– [*Trezor’s published new coin PR criteria*](https://wiki.trezor.io/Developers_guide:Contributing)

Wow… so that sounds like an insta-no on all new-coin PRs. OK… so maybe they just posted that in response to your post. Let us check… Nope… looks like that language was introduced into their documentation between [Nov, 2020](https://web.archive.org/web/20201111233847/https://wiki.trezor.io/Developers_guide:Contributing) and [Jan 2021](https://web.archive.org/web/20210116061115/https://wiki.trezor.io/Developers_guide:Contributing)

> Where is a clear roadmap?

So look… if you don’t like Trezor’s roadmap, that’s fine, everyone can have an opinion. But arguing that they don’t have, nor never have published a roadmap is just weak. I think your posts and comments are getting removed since it is likely more polite than telling you to RTFM.

[kaacaSL]

Up

0

Down

::

Hi, we value every feedback, but the discussion on GitHub should be kept between developers only, as it’s their working tool.

If you feel that Trezor lacks some features and you want to share with us your opinion on that, the best way how to do that is either contacting our Support team (that passes user’s feedback onto our Product team), or using our subreddit or Trezor Forum. Our Product team consults every feedback we receive from our community, there is nothing left behind.

All the comments on GitHub unrelated to the development are deleted though, so our devs can focus on their work.

[ABCRYPTO33]

Up

0

Down

::

Bitcoin only is the way

[Autor]

Beiträge