::
So I figured it out. Because the way the 1inch contract is structured, the transaction of the matic is an internal transaction of the contract. Which is also why the matic transaction doesn’t show up on the transaction overview of the address on polygonscan.
Ledger live doesn’t pick-up internal contract transaction on Polygon apparently, so the transaction never showed in Ledger live. It did pick up the balance, but Ledger back-filled that balance up until the previous transaction. So in Ledger it looked like nothing happened. This is primarily what caused the confusion, so hopefully Ledger can detect these kinds of transaction in the future as well.