Wenn eine Brieftasche gehackt wird, werden dann alle Adressen auf demselben Trezor gehackt?

[root_s2yse8vt]

Up

0

Down

::

Wenn man einen Trezor besitzt und mehrere Adressen für dieses Trezor-Gerät hat. Wenn eine der Adressen gehackt wird, z.B. mit einem verwanzten DEX, werden dann auch alle anderen Adressen geleert?

Soweit ich weiß, nein, aber ich möchte sichergehen. Ich denke, die einzige Möglichkeit, dass alle Adressen verloren gehen, ist, wenn die Seed-Phrase durchsickert (da alle Adressen desselben Trezors auf demselben Seed basieren).

Verstehe ich das richtig?

[brianddk]

Up

0

Down

::

if by “address” you mean EVM address, and by “hacked” you mean “malicious contract”, then no, the malicious contract can only drain the EVM address it was signed with, it can’t move to other address in the wallet.

But if by “address” you mean BIP39-account, and by “hack” you mean “seed-mnemonic seed exfiltration”, then yes, once the seed-mnemonic is known, all accounts on that passphrase are at risk. But accounts on a different passphrase are not.

[simonmales]

Up

0

Down

::

That would be my understanding.

If you don’t interact with any smart contracts. Even better.

[Prahasaurus]

Up

0

Down

::

If you interacted with a smart contract that allowed a hacker to access tokens, that action is limited to the one account (wallet addres) you used at the time, not all accounts created with your Trezor (using the same seed phrase). Because you granted permission to that dodgy smart contract for that specific wallet address only.

My recommendation would be to transfer all tokens out of that impacted account (wallet address) and never use it again.

Edit: the only way all accounts (wallet addresses on your Trezor) can be impacted is if someone got access to your seed phrase. They could then recreate all of your wallet addresses (accounts).

[Cold_Routine1607]

Up

0

Down

::

No. Next question?

[Autor]

Beiträge